New 2019 guidelines for patients with atrial fibrillation
Provided by University of Minnesota
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia. Its prevalence increases with age affecting more than 5% of the population older than 75 years of age. Overall it is estimated that more than 3.000.000 patients in Europe suffer from atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation doubles the possibility of death mainly due to the higher incidence of thromboembolic events and occurrence of heart failure in patients suffering this arrhythmia.
One treatment objective is directed to avoid the negative consequences of the arrhythmia by trying to maintain normal sinus rhythm. Two strategies exist to obtain this result:
1. Chronic treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD)
2. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
1. AAD treatment tries to block or modulate the electrical activity of the heart avoiding initiation and perpetuation of the arrhythmia. It is effective in about 60% of patients and requires long-term treatment. Many of the drugs used have side effects, some of them disabling for the patient. Many drugs are available and combination of them might be used in case of failure. Compliance of the treatment is basic for long-term success.
2. Catheter ablation has emerged as an alternative to obtain stable sinus rhythm in this population. It has been demonstrated that a significant number of AFepisodes initiate in the area of the pulmonary veins located in the left atrium. Using one or several catheters inserted through the femoral veins, they are inserted into the heart and brought to the left atrium through a transseptal approach. Once in the left atrium energy (radiofrequency, cold) is delivered in different areas (mainly around the pulmonary veins) to create lesions that block the electrical activity responsible for the arrhythmia. The effectiveness of this technique is around 70% and in about 25% a second procedure is needed to finish the ablation lines. As any invasive procedure some major complications may occur like cardiac tamponade (1%), thromboembolic events (0.5%) or atrio-esophageal fistula (1/1000). In case of success the patient does not requires continuation with AAD and the arrhythmia is cured.
The decision of which treatment to be used will have to be based on a number of considerations: type of patient, willingness of the patient, experience of the centre in ablative techniques, etc.
It is estimated than more than 10.000 atrial fibrillation ablation procedures are performed annually in Europe and the number is increasing exponentially since over the last years availability of more sophisticated techniques and equipment has produced a marked increase in the number of centres performing atrial fibrillation ablation. Three dimensional mapping systems, robotic techniques, new energy sources and new and more reliable catheters are easing the procedure and improving efficacy and safety.
22 june 2009--The fulfilment which so many people increasingly derive from competitive sports and endurance training comes with a real – even if rare – twist. Because, while most people will enjoy the benefits and pleasures of exercise, there are a few for whom regular athletic training will increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and even sudden death, especially among those in middle-age or with pre-existing cardiac diseases.
"It's for this reason that sports medicine has focused on pre-participation screening," says Dr Luis Mont from the Hospital ClÃnic de Barcelona, Spain, "in an attempt to detect any hidden heart disease." On the other hand, disturbances in heart rhythm, particularly atrial fibrillation, which represent one of the major cardiovascular reasons for hospital admission, is more common among cyclists, marathon runners and other athletes with a long history of endurance training.
Dr Mont reports that atrial fibrillation is more frequent in middle-aged individuals who formerly took part in competitive sports and continue to be active, or simply in those involved in regular endurance training without having actually participated in competitive sports. "So we have to look at the effects of endurance or athletic training with a more open view," says Dr Mont.
However, he adds that the cost-effectiveness of routine pre-participation screening in a broad population of athletes and endurance sports participants has not yet been clarified. A debate on the subject takes place at this Congress on Sunday 21st June at 16.00.
What does seem clearer, however, is that long-term endurance sport participation may well increase the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sinus node dysfunction, and right ventricular premature beats. "Given the fact that an increasing number of individuals engage in regular endurance sports," says Dr Mont, "it is certainly of great interest to define which recommendations for sport should be implemented in an individual patient, and how best to manage arrhythmias in participants." Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmic condition, and sudden cardiac death remains a risk.
Three papers presented at this congress by Dr Mont's group reflect the research effort now being directed towards sports cardiology and the prevention and treatment of rhythm disorders.
1. Efficacy of the circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation in endurance athletes. CPVA is a recently introduced technique which identifies the signals causing the atrial fibrillation and isolates their source in the pulmonary veins from the left ventricle of the heart. The technique has been successfully used in routine patients with atrial fibrillation and, according to new data presented here in Berlin, is now as effective in AF secondary to endurance sports as in other causes. A series of 182 patients in Dr Mont's Barcelona clinic found that freedom of arrhythmias following CPVA was similar in the sports participants as in the regular patients. Left atrial size and long-standing atrial fibrillation were the only independent predictors for arrhythmia recurrence after the treatment, not sports participation.
2. Deconditioning reverses expression of cardiac fibrosis markers in an animal model of endurance training. A more basic science study from Dr Mont's group in Barcelona also suggests that those with a history of arrhythmias following endurance training may benefit from a period of "deconditioning" following their efforts. The suggestion follows a study in animal models which found that markers of cardiac fibrosis in rats whose treadmill exercise was followed by a period of inactivity returned to control levels. Endurance exercise causes cardiac structural changes, including atrial and right ventricular fibrosis – and this fibrosis may play a role in the development of arrhythmias. Although it has been noted that the athlete's heart regresses after inactivity it is not known if the sport-induced atrial and right ventricular fibrosis also reverses after deconditioning. This study suggests that it does and that a period of inactivity might be of benefit in those with a history of fibrillation.
3. Losartan attenuates heart fibrosis induced by chronic endurance training in an animal model. Just as inactivity after training may inhibit cardiac fibrosis in animal models, a similar study suggests that the anti-hypertensive drug losartan prevents the heart fibrosis induced by endurance exercise. The anti-fibrotic effect of losartan, an angiotensin type-II receptor antagonist, appears to be mediated suppression of angiotensin II-induced proliferation of fibroblasts. Again, markers of fibrosis were reduced by administration of losartan.
Notes:
1. EHRA, the European Heart Rhythm Association, aims to serve as the leading organisation in the field of arrhythmias and electrophysiology in Europe, and to attract physicians from all of Europe and beyond to foster the development of this area of expertise. EHRA is a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). EHRA is based in Sophia Antipolis, France. Visit us at www.escardio.org/EHRA
2. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) represents more than 50,000 cardiology professionals across Europe and the Mediterranean. Its mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Visit us at www.escardio.org
Anthony Aizer, M.D., of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, and colleagues assembled data on 16,921 apparently healthy men who took part in the Physicians' Health Study. In 12 years of follow-up, 1,661 men in the cohort developed atrial fibrillation. The researchers used logistic regression to assess the association between vigorous exercise and risk of developing atrial fibrillation. The researchers found that the relative risk of atrial fibrillation increased with the frequency of vigorous exercise: zero days/week, relative risk, 1.0 (referent); one day/week, relative risk, 0.90; one to two days/week, relative risk, 1.09; three to four days/week, relative risk, 1.04; five to seven days/week, relative risk, 1.20. In subgroup analysis, the risk was found to increase further in men less than 50 years old (relative risks, 1.0, 0.94, 1.20, 1.05, and 1.74, respectively) and in joggers (relative risks, 1.0, 0.91, 1.03, 1.30, and 1.53, respectively). "In conclusion, frequency of vigorous exercise was associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation in young men and joggers. This risk decreased as the population aged and was offset by known beneficial effects of vigorous exercise on other atrial fibrillation risk factors," the authors write.
In the first study, Caroline Medi, from the University of Melbourne in Australia, and colleagues examined the characteristics and outcomes of 345 patients with focal atrial tachycardia, where 30 had tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. They found that the frequency of incessant or very frequent paroxysmal tachycardia was much higher in patients with cardiomyopathy (100 versus 20 percent). Left ventricle function was restored in nearly all patients (97 percent) at a mean of three months after successful catheter ablation of the tachycardia focus. In the second study, Riccardo Cappato, M.D., from Policlinico San Donato in Milan, Italy, and colleagues examined the incidence and causes of death in 32,569 patients who had undergone catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. They found that 32 patients died (0.98 per 1,000 patients). The most common causes were tamponade, stroke, atrioesophageal fistula, and massive pneumonia. "The data reported by Cappato et al. are of great clinical interest, and the authors should be congratulated for a contribution that will certainly raise awareness in the electrophysiologic community of the state of contemporary atrial fibrillation ablation," Bernard Belhassen, M.D., from Tel Aviv University in Israel writes in an accompanying editorial. Several authors disclosed financial and consulting relationships with makers of ablation equipment and catheters, including Ablation Frontiers and Biosense Webster. Abstract - Medi
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Abstract - Cappato
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)