'Silent' strokes common after surgery, researchers find



In the largest stroke rehabilitation study ever conducted in the United States, stroke patients who had physical therapy at home improved their ability to walk just as well as those who were treated in a training program that requires the use of a body-weight supported treadmill device followed by walking practice.
29 may 2011--The study, funded by the National Institutes of Health, also found that patients continued to improve up to one year after stroke, defying conventional wisdom that recovery occurs early and tops out at six months. In fact, even patients who started rehabilitation as late as six months after stroke were able to improve their walking.
The results of the study will be published in the May 26, 2011 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine. NIH's National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) provided primary funding for the study.
"More than 4 million stroke survivors experience difficulty walking. Rigorously comparing available physical therapy treatments is essential to determine which is best,'' said Walter Koroshetz, M.D., NINDS deputy director. "The results of this study show that the more expensive, high tech therapy was not superior to intensive home strength and balance training, but both were better than lower intensity physical therapy."
The walking program involves having a patient walk on a treadmill in a harness that provides partial body weight support. This form of rehabilitation, which is known as locomotor training, has become increasingly popular. After the patients complete their training on the treadmill, they practice walking.
Previous studies suggested that these devices, also called commercial lifts or robot-assisted treadmill steppers, are an effective intervention in helping stroke patients walk. But this walking program had not been tested on a large scale or examined in terms of the most appropriate timing for therapy.
The investigators of the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) trial set out to compare the effectiveness of the body-weight supported treadmill training with walking practice started at two different stages--two months post-stroke (early locomotor training) and six months post-stroke (late locomotor training). The locomotor training was also compared against an equivalent schedule of home exercise managed by a physical therapist, aimed at enhancing patients' flexibility, range of motion, strength and balance as a way to improve their walking. The primary measure was each group's improvement in walking at one year after the stroke.
The investigators had hypothesized that the body-weight supported treadmill and walking program, especially early locomotor training, would be superior to a home exercise program. However, they found that all groups did equally well, achieving similar gains in walking speed, motor recovery, balance, social participation and quality of life.
At the end of one year, 52 percent of all the study participants had made significant improvements in their ability to walk. The timing of the locomotor training program did not seem to matter. At one year, no differences were found in the proportion of patients who improved walking with the early or late treadmill training program, nor did the severity of their stroke affect their ability to make progress by the end of the year.
The patients' measure of improvement was based on how well they were able to walk independently by the end of the study period. For example, severely impaired stroke patients were considered improved when they were able to walk around inside the house, whereas the patients who were already mobile at home were considered improved when they could progress to walking independently in the community.
All groups achieved similar gains in the speed and distance of their walking, their physical mobility, motor recovery and social participation, resulting in an improved quality of life.
Simultaneous with intensive therapies, all study participants received usual care, physical therapy consistent with current practice standards, which involved a variable number of sessions of about an hour each. The study found that both the locomotor training and the home physical therapy were superior to usual care. After six months, the patients who were assigned to usual therapy recovered only about half as much as the participants who received one of the two study therapy programs for three months. This finding suggests that either the treadmill training program or the at-home balance and strength training sessions are effective forms of physical therapy, and both are superior to usual care.
Despite reports that most improvement after stroke is complete by six months, the patients assigned to usual care for six months made significant improvements in walking speed after they entered the body-weight supported treadmill and walking program. The researchers said this suggests that recovery beyond six months can be enhanced by further therapy.
Individuals in the locomotor training groups were more likely to feel faint and dizzy during the exercise, and those severely affected patients who received early locomotor training experienced more multiple falls. Fifty-seven percent of participants in the study experienced one fall, 34 percent had multiple falls and 6 percent had a fall resulting in injury. Falls are a common problem among stroke survivors, and the investigators say this study builds on evidence that additional research is needed to prevent falls.
The at-home strength and balance therapy group was the most likely to stick with the program; only 3 percent dropped out of this arm of the study, compared to 13 percent of the locomotor training groups. The authors noted that the home training programs were progressive, intensive, and repetitive, and were highly effective in improving functional status and levels of walking ability, and quality of life at one year post-stroke.
"We were pleased to see that stroke patients who had a home physical therapy exercise program improved just as well as those who did the locomotor training," said Pamela W. Duncan, Ph.D., principal investigator of LEAPS, and professor at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, N.C. "The home physical therapy program is more convenient and pragmatic. Usual care should incorporate more intensive exercise programs that are easily accessible to patients to improve walking, function and quality of life."
The home exercise programs require less expensive equipment, less training for the therapists and fewer clinical staff members. The LEAPS authors suggest that this intervention may help keep stroke survivors active in their own homes and community environments.
More than 400 patients were randomly assigned into the three study groups and participated in 36 90-minute sessions over 12 to 16 weeks. They had either severe or moderate walking impairments. The average age of the patients was 62 years. Fifty-four percent were men and 22 percent were African American. The trial took place at six inpatient rehabilitation centers in Florida and California.
More information: Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, Azen SP, Wu, SS, Nadeau SE, Dobkin BH, Rose DK, Tilson, JK, Cen S, Hayden SK "Body-Weight-Supported Treadmill Rehabilitation Program After Stroke." New England Journal of Medicine, May 26, 2011, Vol. 364;21, pp. 32-42.
Provided by National Institutes of Health
Nerses Sanossian, M.D., of the University of Southern California and Bruce Ovbiagele, M.D., of the University of California, both in Los Angeles, reviewed data on stroke prevention and treatment in the very elderly against a backdrop of increasing life expectancy and a much higher risk of stroke in older age. Research has shown that antihypertensive therapy can reduce stroke incidence and mortality in those over 80 years of age, and that statin therapy may benefit elderly people at high risk of stroke. Some data also supports the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation in individuals over 75 with atrial fibrillation, though this therapy is often not given due to fear of complications. Thrombolysis with alteplase may be helpful for treatment of acute stroke in the very elderly, but should be considered on an individual basis. "Perhaps not surprisingly, the use of evidence-based stroke treatments in patients much older than the clinical trial population in which these treatments were initially tested is of great concern to many clinicians. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that these therapies can be feasibly and effectively used in very elderly patients with stroke or at risk of stroke," the authors conclude.
Pamela H. Mitchell, Ph.D., of the University of Washington in Seattle, and colleagues conducted a randomized study in 101 patients who were identified as clinically depressed after an ischemic stroke. Patients were divided into two groups and treated with either a brief psychosocial-behavioral intervention plus an antidepressant or usual care, including an antidepressant. Treatment was continued over eight weeks. Compared with the usual-care group, the researchers found that patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower depression score both immediately after treatment and at 12 months. The mean percent decrease in depression score after 12 months was significantly greater in the intervention group compared with the usual-care group (47 versus 32 percent). Additionally, the authors note, significantly more of the patients in the intervention group were in remission both after treatment and at 12 months. "A brief psychosocial-behavioral intervention adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is highly effective in reducing depression and achieving remission in the short term with the effect sustained for up to two years," the authors write. "Participants in the usual-care control group also reduced their depression over the first year, but more slowly and with a lesser degree of remission."
Mandip S. Dhamoon, M.D., of Columbia University in New York City, and colleagues analyzed data from 525 survivors of a first ischemic stroke, all at least 40 years of age. The researchers evaluated subjects at six months and annually for five years, assessing functional status with the Barthel Index, terming it favorable or unfavorable based on the score. Follow-up was censored at death, a recurrent stroke or a heart attack. The researchers found that the proportion of patients with favorable functional status declined annually after adjusting for demographics, risk factors, and stroke characteristics (odds ratio per year after stroke, 0.91). The functional status of those with Medicaid or no insurance declined, but the status of those with Medicare or private insurance did not. "Functional decline in our study was seen particularly among those who were uninsured or insured with Medicaid. This decline began to be apparent at approximately three years," the authors write. "Over time after stroke, however, functional status among those with private insurance and Medicare and those with Medicaid or no insurance may diverge due to disparities in care and more limited access to rehabilitative services, information about health, and ongoing management of risk factors and chronic conditions that are known to have an impact on functional status."
Brain scans showed that while just 12 percent of seniors asked about strokes remembered having had one, nearly a third had brain damage showing they had.
The stroke itself could damage memory, and many people may also have so-called silent strokes that are never diagnosed at the time, Dr. Christiane Reitz of Columbia University Medical Center in New York and colleagues wrote in the Archives of Neurology.
"Stroke is associated with motor impairment but can also be accompanied by impairments in memory, sensation and speech or language, diminishing the ability of an individual to accurately report a history of stroke," they wrote.
The team studied magnetic resonance imaging or MRI scans of 717 people 65 or older who were covered by the federal Medicare insurance program for the elderly. "Approximately 75 percent of strokes occur in persons older than 65 years," the researchers wrote.
The volunteers were interviewed about their health and took some basic neurological and psychological tests. Patients and their caregivers also completed a survey about stroke history, including whether they had stroke symptoms or had been told they had a stroke.
Nearly 12 percent, or 85 people, said they had. But MRI scans showed 225 people, or 30 percent, had actually suffered a stroke.
People who got it wrong were more likely to have poorer memory or language ability, or have stroke risk factors such as high blood pressure or a history of a heart attacks. Younger people in the study were more likely to get it right.
"However, it is likely that some of the strokes that were not reported were silent strokes," the researchers wrote.
The team said researchers who want to study stroke in older adults need to rely on MRI scans, and not patients, to get accurate information about stroke history.
HOUSTON, 04 may 2009– For the first time, scientists have discovered a single gene defect that causes thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections as well as early onset coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke and Moyamoya disease. The research is led by scientists at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
The study, "Mutations in Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin (ACTA2) Cause Early Onset Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke and Moyamoya Disease, Along with Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections," was published early online April 30 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.
"If someone is found to have an alteration or mutation in this gene, we can do screening for vascular diseases, and if diagnosed with disease, they can take medications and undergo surgical approaches to prevent premature death or disability," said senior author and principal investigator Dianna Milewicz, M.D., Ph.D., professor and director of the Division of Medical Genetics at The University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
The discovery of the causal relationship between the mutated gene ACTA2 and artery diseases has opened the door to a new way of thinking about the vascular system, Milewicz said.
"We need to look at the artery system as a continuous system or organ," said Milewicz, the President George Bush Professor in Cardiovascular Medicine. "We've been looking at it the wrong way. If you have this particular genetic mutation, it can present in several different diseases affecting different arteries."
Milewicz and her team studied 127 members of 20 families from around the world who had ACTA2 mutations. They were phenotyped for premature vascular diseases, defined as an age of onset less than 55 years in men and less than 60 years in women.
Premature thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections were the main vascular disease for 76 mutation carriers, while 26 had premature coronary artery disease, 15 had ischemic stroke, including Moyamoya disease, and 15 had more than one vascular disease.
In thoracic aortic disease, the wall of the aorta, the main blood vessel leading out of the heart, weakens and forms an aneurysm that can ultimately lead to an aortic dissection and death. Coronary artery disease, the most common type of heart disease, is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the country.
In the study, none of the family members without the ACTA2 defect had any vascular disease, helping to rule out other genetic or environmental causes. In four families, members younger than age 20 suffered a stroke and five strokes resulted from Moyamoya disease, a rare stroke disease in which the internal carotid arteries become occluded.
The main function of smooth muscle cells is to contract in response to the stretching from pulsing blood flow. Vascular pathology from mutant aortas and analysis of smooth muscle cells removed from patients and grown in the laboratory suggest that persons with ACTA2 have increased multiplication of smooth muscle cells that contribute to blocked or enlarged arteries, according to the study.
Milewicz and her team previously discovered the role of the mutated ACTA2; mutations in ACTA2 account for 14 percent of the inherited form of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections, making it the major gene identified for the condition.
During the research, Milewicz identified a large family with persistent livedo reticularis, a purplish mesh-like skin discoloration caused by the occlusion of arteries in the skin. This family also had a history of premature onset coronary artery disease and premature stroke without the risk factors know to cause these diseases (smoking, high cholesterol)
"Family members asked if it all could be related and I told them at the time that they just had really bad luck with several mutated genes," Milewicz said. "It didn't occur to me until later that it might be from the same genetic defect."
The study results from collaborative efforts of physicians and scientists in the Texas Medical Center including surgeons Hazim Safi, M.D., professor and chairman of the Department of Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery at the UT Houston Medical School; Dong Kim, M.D., chairman of the medical school's Department of Neurosurgery and director of the Mischer Neuroscience Institute at Memorial Hermann—Texas Medical Center; and Anthony Estrera, M.D., associate professor of cardiothoracic vascular surgery.
The finding suggests the common pain reliever, which is known as acetaminophen in the United States, should be considered as a cheap and widespread stroke therapy.
A temperature above 37 degrees Celsius immediately after a stroke is known to worsen the prognosis, with the odds of a poor outcome doubling for every degree increase. About a third of stroke patients have temperatures above 37.5.
Paracetamol at a daily dose of 6 grams reduces body temperature by about 0.3 degrees.
Doctors from the Erasmus MC University Medical Center in Rotterdam carried out a 1,400-patient study comparing outcomes for stroke patients given paracetamol and a placebo.
They found that 40 percent of patients with a baseline body temperature of 37-39 degrees given paracetamol improved beyond expectations.
Writing in the journal Lancet Neurology, Heleen den Hertog and colleagues said the results needed further confirmation in a larger study but that paracetamol could be a simple, safe and cheap treatment for strokes.